With analysts speculating about the impact the iPad will have on AT&T’s already struggling 3G network, concerns from the FCC brings even more apprehension. Below is a report from The Federal Communications Commission’s Broadband.gov blog by John Leibovitz, Deputy Chief Wireless Telecommunications Bureau blog and Phil Bellaria, Scenario Planning.
Apple’s iPad announcement has set off a new round of reports of networks overburdened by a data flow they were not built to handle. These problems are reminiscent of the congestion dialup users experienced following AOL’s 1996 decision to allow unlimited internet use. For months users had trouble connecting and, once they did connect, experienced frequent service outages. The FCC even held hearings on the problem.
The congestion problem circa 1996-97 revealed an intense latent demand for Internet access. Similarly, wireless network congestion today reveals intense demand for wireless broadband. Widespread use of smartphones, 3G-enabled netbooks, and now, perhaps, the iPad and its competitors demonstrate that wireless broadband will be a hugely important part of the broadband ecosystem as we move ahead.
Eventually, AOL was able to resolve its problems by upgrading its modem and server capacities. Wireless providers today, too, will be able to deal with congestion issues but only if they have adequate spectrum. Reaching an always-on wireless broadband future means that spectrum can no longer remain attached solely to uses deemed valuable decades ago. The broadband plan will suggest ways of moving more spectrum into high value uses, such as broadband access, to help ensure that we don’t get stuck in 1997 dialup-style congestion.
With so much speculation surrounding whether or not AT&T will be able to support the growing demand on their network with the introduction of the iPad and growing number of iPhones, this is definitely an issue that we haven’t heard the last of.
What steps do you think Apple and AT&T should take to ensure network demands for the iPad and iPhones are met?